MX 5 2 g

Product Information

Arctic MX-4 is a popular thermal compound or thermal paste used in computer systems to improve heat transfer between the CPU (Central Processing Unit) or GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) and the heat sink.

Although I do run it at 4K so this is more GPU heavy than at 1440p when the CPU would get more heavily utilised. I have tried repasting several time, cleaning using lint free paper and solvent so made no difference and gave up entirely on thermal grizzly. We were able to find the mixture of substances used in the MX-5 as can be seen in the above picture.That means for air cooling, to cope with increasing temperature in the heatsink you need to move the air across it faster. When I went to remove the eSport ONE to replace it with my AIO, I twisted the heatsink back and forth until it felt like the MX-5 was breaking loose. Please keep in mind that the thermal conductivity of the thermal paste is much lower than the thermal conductivity of metals likes aluminum or copper since aluminum has 205 W/mK and copper has 385 W/mK whereas the majority of the thermal pastes have up to 5 W/mK ratings with a few ranging up to 14 W/mK. Their bases of operation are in Switzerland, Germany, Hong Kong, and the USA with the availability of their products in over 45 countries.

Some packages of MX-6 also come with MX Cleaner, a substance for residue-free cleaning of contact surfaces. In this comparison of Arctic MX-4 vs MX-5 vs MX-6, we will look into the distinctive attributes of MX-4, MX-5, and MX-6, evaluating their thermal conductivity, compatibility, durability, and user-friendliness. It doesn’t dry out, harden, or degrade quickly under temperature fluctuations, ensuring consistent heat transfer performance. We don't yet know exactly what to expect from MX-6, but our hunch tell us that this will be a yet another all-around performer from Arctic, but perhaps designed to better suit the upcoming CPUs from AMD and Intel. The tube of Mx-5 i got was totally fine, i don't really feel like going through all the trouble of repasting again.In my opinion, no other paste is worth using after testing a good batch of this MX-5 however, and liquid metal is not worth the 3-5 degrees in performance you might gain from a good application. To be honest, I have never had thermal paste go bad, not to mention most enthusiast do not use their computer for that long. In this test, my computer was sitting on the basement floor, resulting in much colder air being drawn in. Less than a year into the MX-5’s existence, the first publicly known flaw is associated with this thermal paste for which it may achieve lower thermal conductivity than expected.

ARCTIC sent us a 20g tube of their MX-2 thermal paste 14 years ago, and I am not even close to finishing it. These fans are designed to enhance airflow within a computer case, which is crucial for maintaining optimal temperatures. This means that at equal noise levels, you will achieve lower cooling performance, and it doesn’t really matter what fan you use. This results in extremely high thermal conductivity, which quickly and efficiently dissipates heat from the CPU or GPU.It is like it has not been mixed properly as there are very runny watery parts and very thick parts that don't really want to come out of the syringe and I needed to mix it ON the CPU lid for ages until I was happy it would have a consistent thickness across the CPU. However, it is not only a choice between light (P12 Max White) and dark (P12 Max Black), but also between different types of bearings, fluid dynamic and ball ones. W/m-K is not bad compared to cheap and mainstream thermal greases, it is considerably below thermal conductivity of market leaders like Thermal Grizzly's Kryonaut and Kryonaut Extreme that are designed with extreme overclockers in mind.

Other than that as far as I am aware everything is working hunky dory and I've had my pc running for a couple of months now since I used it :) I'm happy with it and I would think most normal users would be too. As far as the thermal paste is concerned, the Noctua NT-H2 was 1c better than its predecessor, which is consistent with my colleague Aaron Lai's review in 2019. Of course, this could also have been due to complaints from end users (as is often the case…), but we won’t find out now. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average.Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. Answer: Arctic MX-6 offers around 20% better thermal performance compared to MX-4, as well as improved durability and resistance to leakage compared to MX-5.